Asus 對 Netgear

AC68 及 R7000硬體相當，但AC68的表現又比R7000差。但又話R7000的firmware又比AC68差。價錢又接近，大家點睇呢?

一般的switch如TP-link等，用等過嗎? HP的太貴了。

tomleehk

新手上路

Rank: 1

10^#

發表於 2014-2-25 21:08 | 只看該作者

回復 tomleehk
Do you mean Asus is more easy for firmware flashing?
冰之風發表於 2014-2-25 19:49

Asus的firmware刷不死亦易救 ...

TOP

冰之風

新手上路

Rank: 1

9^#

發表於 2014-2-25 19:49 | 只看該作者

回復 7# tomleehk
Do you mean Asus is more easy for firmware flashing?

TOP

冰之風

新手上路

Rank: 1

8^#

發表於 2014-2-25 19:47 | 只看該作者

回復 6# 雯雯
謝謝!

TOP

tomleehk

新手上路

Rank: 1

7^#

發表於 2014-2-24 16:28 | 只看該作者

本帖最後由 tomleehk 於 2014-2-24 16:49 編輯

回復冰之風

Asus的firmware刷不死亦易救 ...

雯雯發表於 2014-2-24 15:54

Agree.. In general I will also select ASUS broadcom based router..

According to
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/w ... 000-a-asus-rt-ac68u
Both are broadcom based routers and Netgear R7000 has a faster CPU (4709)..

According to Broadcom, the main difference between the two processors is that the 4709 has a 1 GHz clock speed per core, vs. 4708's 800 MHz. The 4709 also supports faster DDR3-1600 memory and has "some other I/O" differences.

I assume you will go for DD-WRT or other third party firmware..

Therefore, if you are confident and skilled with firmware flashing, it is suggested to select Netgear..

Otherwise, it is suggested to select Asus..

TOP

雯雯