返回列表 發帖

Asus 對 Netgear

AC68 及 R7000硬體相當,但AC68的表現又比R7000差。但又話R7000的firmware又比AC68差。價錢又接近,大家點睇呢?

一般的switch如TP-link等,用等過嗎? HP的太貴了。

回復 1# 冰之風

我揀Asus.
Welcome to my TaoBao shop: http://mandymak520.taobao.com/

TOP

回復 2# 雯雯
師姐可否賜教下點解呢? 想做多D功課

TOP

她们的Hardware比较,还有third party firmware support。

TOP

回復 4# 角色
R7000都有dd-wrt喎

TOP

回復 3# 冰之風

用過不少router, netgear有用過, asus也用過不少. asus的firmware刷不死亦易救, 而且有不少第3方的firmware.
Welcome to my TaoBao shop: http://mandymak520.taobao.com/

TOP

本帖最後由 tomleehk 於 2014-2-24 16:49 編輯
回復  冰之風

Asus的firmware刷不死亦易救 ...

雯雯 發表於 2014-2-24 15:54


Agree.. In general I will also select ASUS broadcom based router..

According to
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/w ... 000-a-asus-rt-ac68u
Both are broadcom based routers and Netgear R7000 has a faster CPU (4709)..

According to Broadcom, the main difference between the two processors is that the 4709 has a 1 GHz clock speed per core, vs. 4708's 800 MHz. The 4709 also supports faster DDR3-1600 memory and has "some other I/O" differences.

I assume you will go for DD-WRT or other third party firmware..

Therefore, if you are confident and skilled with firmware flashing, it is suggested to select Netgear..

Otherwise, it is suggested to select Asus..

TOP

回復 6# 雯雯
謝謝!

TOP

回復 7# tomleehk
Do you mean Asus is more easy for firmware flashing?

TOP

回復  tomleehk
Do you mean Asus is more easy for firmware flashing?
冰之風 發表於 2014-2-25 19:49


Asus的firmware刷不死亦易救 ...

TOP

返回列表